Tamron sells a 70-200 2.8 that's every bit as good as Nikon's 70-200 VRI/II 2.8 and weighs only 400g more than Nikons 70-200 f4 sans tripod collar. If you're fine with the weight while shooting, then you can find better ways to save 400g in your pack (packing less, buying a lighter bag, etc.)
Nikon Z 70-180mm VS 70-200mm F2.8 Nikon 600 PF f6.3 vs 600 F4 TC vs 400 F2.8 TC Tuesday, 28 November 2023 04:33. $4800 vs $15500 - Is this a fair fight??
The options are: Nikon 80-200mm F2.8D for €600. Nikon 70-200mm F2.8 VR II for €950. Read a lot of good things about the 80-200, built like a tank, great image quality, more budget friendly. I'm only worried will not be fast enough to my liking. The 70-200mm is newer, no doub it's optically just as great as the 80-200 but also a bit more
F-Mount Lens/FX Format. Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22. One XLD Element, Five LD Elements. eBAND, BBAR, and Fluorine Coatings. Show More. A popular telephoto zoom for a variety of shooting applications, this Nikon F-mount SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Lens from Tamron is characterized by its bright f/2.8 constant maximum aperture, as well as
The Canon RF 70-200mm F4 and F2.8 lenses are both excellent options, but the F2.8 lens offers a wider aperture, allowing for better low-light performance and more dramatic bokeh effects. Additionally, the F2.8 lens is heavier and more expensive than the F4 lens. Credit: www.pictureline.com Table of ContentsBuild And DesignSize And Weight ComparisonWeather Sealing FeaturesTripod […]
The one I am interested EF 70-200L/4.0 IS II vs 70-200 GM @200mm/F4.0 in TDP test. 70-200 GM is known has copy variation, and I am not a big fan of studio test in close distance on resolution chart but prefer outdoor test from distance to be more resemble in real-world usage. So just for reference.
h197.
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/276
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/221
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/121
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/289
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/22
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/368
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/195
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/58
  • 2rrioibxr0.pages.dev/326

    • nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8